Sunday, October 30, 2011

The Real Slim Shady: mobile network operators

May I have your attention please? Will the real Slim Shady please stand up? I repeat, will the real Slim Shady please stand up? We're gonna have a problem here...The FCC wont let me be (Eminem)
Early termination fees (ETF) from mobile network operators are out of control. I get wonky when things are out of control. Wonky equals time to get creative.
Its important to understand what is in the contract with your mobile network operator (MNO). There is a Federal Universal Service Charge (FUSC) on your bill. I promise. It may be more difficult to find on your electronic bill and will be disguised with something along the lines of, "Other Charges & Credits or Taxes, Governmental Surcharges & Fees." I will reference Verizon as that was the MNO I successfully got to drop the $400 ETF for both phones.

What is the FUSC?
This is a charge created by the FCC to fund  programs that help people in rural communities get telecommunication services, help low income families afford phone service, help pay for teleconferencing systems that are used by rural hospitals, and internet access for schools. That is all really awesome except that its a hidden tax that Verizon is ultimately responsible for. MNO's pass on the surcharge to their customers. This fee fluctuates. Sometimes it decreases and other times it increases. If you notice an increase in this charge you can get out of your contract and avoid the ETF. The magic sentence is, "The rate increase has a material adverse affect on me." What an awesome yet vague legal term.

I am a loophole guru. Here is my guide:
1.) Your MNO will not make this easy. Just be patient, expect to talk to multiple people, and possibly a good chunk of time on the phone with them. Be prepared. Grab your bill and a copy of your contract so you can point out the page, paragraph and lines to the reps. Sound confident. Even if your not. The rep I initially got had no clue what I was talking about.

2.) Call cancellation dept: state you noticed an increase in the FUSC and tell them in your contract it states any prices changes that have a  material adverse affect on you allows you to cancel within 60 days without paying an early termination fee.
3.) Don't believe them when they tell you the FUSC is not a fee set by them so there is nothing they can do because it is a mandatory government charge. Agree with them. Tell them you know this is a mandatory government charge however its a mandatory surcharge Verizon is responsible for. They will reference the, "taxes fees and surcharges we don't set," section of the contract. This is where you point to the section,  "charges and fees we set." The paragraph states, "the FUSC is set by Verizon."
4.) They will claim that material adverse affects have nothing to do with price changes but to do with coverage changes. Go back to original paragraph that states, "we can also change prices and any other conditions in this agreement at any time." further down it states, "if the changes have a material adverse affect on you then you can cancel within 60 days without paying an early termination fee.
5.) Now they will try to claim the change does not have a  materially adverse affect on you because it is only a matter of a few pennies. You can get a little defensive here. Verizon can not tell you what materially adverse is because they have no idea what your financial situation is. If you are good with numbers try and slam them with the percentage approach. A few cents could be a 30% to 40 % increase because if this happens every months those pennies add up.
6.) They will offer a credit because this negates the material adverse affect because now you are not losing any money. Get ready for the hardest argument. Point out that in the contract nothing states that they can negate the affect; though it does say if the affect happens then you can cancel your contract. Another approach is to point out that they are admitting to the affect happening  because they saying they are negating the affect. Then politely remind them they cant change rules of contract after both parties have signed it.


Submitted by Cullen McManus

The New Tom Waits Record

In my mind the most important songwriter/lyricist/philosopher of the modern world is the great Tom Waits. His previous efforts where nothing short of musical revelations, with blending styles from 1930's jazz to southern blues to modern rock he has away of taking music cross genres and putting forth a work that bows to no conformity. Mr. Waits newest album is no different. The opening track is a New Orleans style Jazz number that sets the pace for a record that is all killer, no filler. As far as lyrical content, there is a reason the man has been referred to as the Charles Bukowski of music, their is a poetic flow to his word that take the gritty of common life and make them soft and beautiful.

Have a listen here:
http://www.npr.org/2011/10/23/141565981/first-listen-tom-waits-bad-as-me?sc=fb&cc=fp

Submitted by Alex Heinz

The Travel Channel You're One Stop Channel For Action Packed with Shows and Travel Tips!

If you spend your time watching TV shows like No Reservations, Man vs. Food Nation, Ghost Adventures, or Off Limits, then great news! You’r e a fan of the Travel Channel parent company Scripps Network Interactive. 
The Travel Channels goal is based on idea. To connect people to the power and joy of human journeys that inspire, surprise and entertain. Consumers are going to experience storytelling, shared human connections, and engaging talent that celebrates the surprising encounters that happen right here and right now.
As a fan of travel, local and international, I am drawn to these TV shows and find myself spending countless hours getting ideas for places to travel, new foods to eat, seeing places I’ve never been to and getting the crap scared out of me.

One show I am going to watch is The Layover, Anthony Bourdain.  See a sneak preview here    
The Layover Sneak Peak Travel Channel Show

http://www.travelchannel.com/ 
The website has sections for videos, weekly pictures, and travel tips. 
The videos range from clips of hit shows on Travel Channel and places to travel. There is a weekly picture gallery that includes this photo.


In the Places & Trips section, you can look at various ideas to plan a trip you’re interested in taking and in which location of the world. You can also review host central, where the TV show hosts have reviewed travel destinations.
In a world filled of reality show and celeb stalker madness, the Travel Channel offers me a glimpse into real life and actual situations that I can experience.
 
Submitted by Sean Platz


Who Decides When a Missing Child gets National Media Coverage?’

      Children go missing in our country all the time. One source states that roughly over 800,000 children are reported missing each year. This number is obviously high, as many of these are ‘family abductions’, and are not typical kidnappings, the kind of the story national news media covers extensively. Yet hundreds of children are kidnapped, plucked on their way home from school or out of their bedrooms at night, yet we only hear about a handful of cases that have extensive national coverage. Local news media is generally supportive of local kidnappings, but what if the child was taken across state lines far away? Many times these children are rescued due to tips assisted by the media. So why is it that some cases never get the attention of the national media, ultimately abandoning the forgotten child and his family. I have always wondered, as I can watch the news for weeks covering the story of an abducted child out in Idaho, why can’t every abducted child receive fair and similar coverage that could help lead to them being found? Family prominence or affluence should not be a factor in determining the amount of effort in helping to locate a missing child the media should have. In many cases of child abductions being ignored by national media, coincidentally or not, the children have been minorities or from a poor family or a dangerous area. I cringe to think that the national media would still prioritize the life of a rich white child over other children, and I truly hope that fair national news coverage and justice is sought for all the missing children in our country.

Submitted by Anthony Federico

The 99% vs the 53%

One movement that had been in the spotlight for about a month now is the Occupy Wall Street protests. This is a group of individuals who refer to themselves at the "99%," meaning the 99% of invididuals who were not bailed out of the most recent economic recession. These groups have begun to assemble in major cities to protest economic greed and encourage an equal dispursement of wealth  along with other demands including debt forgiveness and an open boarder policy. In response to this movement, conservative groups have launched a Tumblr account called "We Are The 53%." This group represents the 53% of citizens who pay taxes as oposed to the 46% in the country who do not. The 53% openly criticizes the Wall Street protestors for blaming their economic troubles on others. They encourage the value of hard work and self-reliance in Americans that is needed in hard economic times.
As I look through this blog, I'm loving everything that I see. I will be graduating from college in the spring and I will soo after begin paying back my student loans. That being said, I don't understand why there are so many other people my age who feels like they are owed something. I understand that college is expensive and people are having a hard time finding jobs, but it's not fair to blame Wall Street for those hardships. They did nothing to help accumulate the protestor's debt so they should be responsible for paying it back. I know that I'm going to struggle after I graduate but I know that I will have a strong sense of pride and accomplishment when I pay my own way and I am able to support myself. I want to set up a foundation for a good life and I'm not going to do it by camping out on a city sidewalk.
Feel free to comment!

Submitted by Aarons Routses

Where Is The Originality/New Faces of Rock?

  I think it's safe to say that everyone loves music. Whether it be R&B, hip-hop, pop, dance, rock, heavy metal, or country, everyone also has their favorite genre too. I can remember going to my grandmother's old house and seeing various soundtracks to musicals like Evita and The Phantom of the Opera. With my parents, their catalog of music is dominated by classic rock bands like Aerosmith and the Rolling Stones. My two brothers only listen to hip hop and pop punk, and my older sister listens to pop music from today all the way to the 80's. I'm not particularly picky with genres, with a minor exception to country, but if I did have to pick a favorite genre or two, it would be rock and heavy metal.

   I really can't help but notice though, that there is a lack of originality and new faces in the rock genre. In metal, it is at least evolving and has a variety of new bands that are coming out different enough from the rest. However, metal really isn't the type of genre that dominates the charts (I think the last real heavy metal album to debut at #1 on the Billboard charts was Metallica's Death Magnetic back in 2008). Rock does though, and it's the same bands from the 90's and early 2000's that still dominate the charts. Using the Billboard Rock charts as an example, the Top Ten rock singles are:

10. Blink 182 - "Up All Night"
9. Nickelback - "Bottoms Up'
8. Rise Against - "Make It Stop (September's Children)"
7. Coldplay - "Paradise"
6. Staind - "Not Again"
5. Seether - "Tonight"
4. Foster the People - "Pumped Up Kicks"
3. Bush - "The Sound of Winter"
2. Red Hot Chili Peppers - "The Adventures of Rain Dance Maggie"
1. Foo Fighters - "Walk"




  The only band on there that hasn't been on the charts at least once before is Foster the People. The majority of these bands have formed in the 90's, or in the Chili Peppers case the 80's, and had big hits since then. Foster the People formed in 2009, and their song "Pumped Up Kicks" is one of the most original sounding songs in rock today. Seether and Staind are still playing agnsty post-grunge music, Nickelback is still singing about partying, Bush, Coldplay, and Blink-182 still sound the same, Rise Against is getting kind of preachy nowadays, and two of my favorite bands, the Red Hot Chili Peppers and Foo Fighters are making great music still, but it's nothing really new and refreshing. I guess my point is, there is nothing really new to bring to the table with rock music. At least hip hop changes quite a bit, despite it's criticisms.
Submitted by Colin Barry

  

Saturday, October 29, 2011

Pictures Come to Life… Literally


The Lytro Camera is a new camera advancement that allows you to transform your pictures into “living pictures.”  Instead of measuring pictures in megapixel, the Lytro Camera measure pictures in “megarays” (which is the equivalency to 22 megapixels). You are probably questioning how this “magical” camera is able to produce lively pictures. Well, the simple camera has only two buttons, one for power and the other for shutter. By just simply taking a picture of your desired object, the image will automatically be saved into a branded file format. You can manipulate your image such as changing the focus on your computer just like any raw file right after the picture has already been taken! However, the camera is only compatible with MACs (a Windows version is still in development). Currently the 8G camera is priced at $400 (stores up to 350 photos) and the 16G is priced at $500 (stores up to 750 photos). The Lytro Cameras are available for pre-order but will not ship until early 2012. I myself would definitely like to see how this “magical camera” produces “living pictures.
Submitted by Elizabeth Kinchan